- August 30th, 2010, 3:49 pm#258729
Oscar looks nothing like him.
"Why don't you take your flashlight and get lost?" - P. Venkman
- August 30th, 2010, 5:27 pm#258748
I think it was that baby that had some old mans face in his face. kinda wierd.
- August 30th, 2010, 6:01 pm#258760
Well, we all thought it was kind of obvious they would go this route and sure enough they did. Not real shocking stuff. Still trying to be optimistic and hope they have some great writing and GB humor.
"Nice thinkin', Ray."
- August 30th, 2010, 6:16 pm#258765
Absurd bullshit.
If this is the quality of script plotting, then I hope this film never gets made.
If this is the quality of script plotting, then I hope this film never gets made.
- August 30th, 2010, 6:35 pm#258775
No. Just no. Just. Hell No.
Oscar as Venkman's adopted/spiritual son? Of course that works. Venkman could have basically raised Oscar since he was eight months old.
Retconning Oscar into Venkman's biological child? No. Fail. Massive, steaming pile of fail.
Oscar as Venkman's adopted/spiritual son? Of course that works. Venkman could have basically raised Oscar since he was eight months old.
Retconning Oscar into Venkman's biological child? No. Fail. Massive, steaming pile of fail.
- August 30th, 2010, 7:15 pm#258787
Kingpin wrote:Absurd bullshit.That about sums up my thoughts.
Somehow there's always someone who can do things thought impossible, simply because they do not realize that they should be incapable of the achievement.
- August 30th, 2010, 7:28 pm#258793
Kingpin wrote:Absurd bullshit.
If this is the quality of script plotting, then I hope this film never gets made.
Gary Price is a GOOF!!!!
- August 30th, 2010, 7:42 pm#258797
mikegb1984x wrote:I think it was that baby that had some old mans face in his face. kinda wierd.Ok I remember the baby now, but who is the old man? What's that all about?
- August 30th, 2010, 9:18 pm#258825
c'mon guys it makes perfect sense!
theres nothing said about him being related to venkman in GB2, and venkman totally doesnt act like its his kid in fact its clear as my shit in the toilet that venkman's first time seeing the child is in Dana's apartment . . . oh and also ITS NOT HIS f****g KID
makes perfect sense.
jesus f****g christ
theres nothing said about him being related to venkman in GB2, and venkman totally doesnt act like its his kid in fact its clear as my shit in the toilet that venkman's first time seeing the child is in Dana's apartment . . . oh and also ITS NOT HIS f****g KID
makes perfect sense.
jesus f****g christ
- August 30th, 2010, 11:51 pm#258856
kind2311 wrote:c'mon guys it makes perfect sense!It wouldn't be the first time a woman has concealed the birth of a child from the real father. I mean we don't know the circumstances of their breakup. But obviously Dana wanted nothing to do with him at the time.
theres nothing said about him being related to venkman in GB2, and venkman totally doesnt act like its his kid in fact its clear as my shit in the toilet that venkman's first time seeing the child is in Dana's apartment . . . oh and also ITS NOT HIS f****g KID
makes perfect sense.
jesus f****g christ
- August 31st, 2010, 12:00 am#258858
HOLY SHIT.
For the fastest way to get in contact, please email me: webmaster@gbfans.com
Like GBFans on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gbfans
Follow GBFans on Twitter: @gbfans
Like GBFans on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gbfans
Follow GBFans on Twitter: @gbfans
- August 31st, 2010, 6:07 am#258873
GhostGuy wrote:In GB2 Oscar was 9 months old....and he was in his mother's belly for nine months....it's a year and 6 months BEFORE GB2...and 3 years and 6 months AFTER Gb1...Peter and Dana could have had a sexual affair when they were engaged and then they broked up bad english, i knowkind2311 wrote:c'mon guys it makes perfect sense!It wouldn't be the first time a woman has concealed the birth of a child from the real father. I mean we don't know the circumstances of their breakup. But obviously Dana wanted nothing to do with him at the time.
theres nothing said about him being related to venkman in GB2, and venkman totally doesnt act like its his kid in fact its clear as my shit in the toilet that venkman's first time seeing the child is in Dana's apartment . . . oh and also ITS NOT HIS f****g KID
makes perfect sense.
jesus f****g christ
why don't you all go away!!!!!!!
- August 31st, 2010, 7:05 am#258878
Don't try to justify it or try explain it, the point is that it's incredibly lazy writing... something being touted as a major plot twist and it's utterly rediculous.
- August 31st, 2010, 7:32 am#258882
as long as Oscar don't fly with the monkeys....i'll be fine with that
why don't you all go away!!!!!!!
- August 31st, 2010, 8:31 am#258899
This news makes me want to punch babies.
My Two Cents .02
Kent Brockman
Kent Brockman
- August 31st, 2010, 9:23 am#258919
being that its the exact same plot device used in KOTCS, i hope its just a bad rumor. i liked KOTCS, but 2 movie series returning after 20 years so close to each other should steer clear of each others plot points
- August 31st, 2010, 3:02 pm#259038
"This is surreal-- like they made a really good movie out of all these internet nerds I know."
Ray... when someone asks you 'where the booty at' you say 'WHOOT THERE IT IS.'
Candid Ecto Photos: http://picturesofsomenerdsectomobile.tumblr.com/
It's a neat plot device, but cripes, really?
"This is surreal-- like they made a really good movie out of all these internet nerds I know."
Ray... when someone asks you 'where the booty at' you say 'WHOOT THERE IT IS.'
Candid Ecto Photos: http://picturesofsomenerdsectomobile.tumblr.com/
- August 31st, 2010, 6:18 pm#259095
Im not surprised or really care. I mean really u think that dana banged the stiff, i mean for real look at the guy. This plot idea wouldnt bother me.
what will bother me IS A DAMN FEMALE GHOSTBUSTER. Thats just BS. For F*ck sakes.
what will bother me IS A DAMN FEMALE GHOSTBUSTER. Thats just BS. For F*ck sakes.
- August 31st, 2010, 6:28 pm#259099
mikegb1984x wrote:what will bother me IS A DAMN FEMALE GHOSTBUSTER. Thats just BS. For F*ck sakes.Really? And why is that?
Somehow there's always someone who can do things thought impossible, simply because they do not realize that they should be incapable of the achievement.
- August 31st, 2010, 6:44 pm#259105
Seriously, we don't need a third movie. It's a sign of things to come, guys. That and crappy, crappy CGI. In two years we'll all be here trying to brain bleach that thing out. Remember this, I called it first.
BSjohnson wrote:Eesh. Awkward. That's a good question. Why exactly?mikegb1984x wrote:what will bother me IS A DAMN FEMALE GHOSTBUSTER. Thats just BS. For F*ck sakes.Really? And why is that?
Seriously, we don't need a third movie. It's a sign of things to come, guys. That and crappy, crappy CGI. In two years we'll all be here trying to brain bleach that thing out. Remember this, I called it first.
- August 31st, 2010, 7:16 pm#259122
Hey it worked in Superman Returns right? Actually no... it didn't.
- August 31st, 2010, 7:21 pm#259124
You're right, no third movie is needed. Let's skip right to the fourth movie. That'll confuse the hell out of people when Ghostbusters 4 comes out.
Don't talk to anyone. Don't touch anything, don't do anything, don't interact with anyone, and try not to look at anything.
- August 31st, 2010, 7:53 pm#259133
Vincenzo330 wrote:Hey it worked in Superman Returns right? Actually no... it didn't.Good point.
kevinj319 wrote:You're right, no third movie is needed. Let's skip right to the fourth movie. That'll confuse the hell out of people when Ghostbusters 4 comes out.Better yet, let's skip to the 6th. A little George Lucasism can't hurt at this point, plus it'll explain the 22 years gap between the movies. And that way we'll skip the inevitable trilogy that'll be greenlighted. *Shudder*
GB News is calling the Pink Camo Tint the last m[…]
Also probably different release dates. USA[…]