- August 26th, 2011, 6:04 am#341949
http://www.avclub.com/articles/dan-aykr ... app,60973/
http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a ... urray.html
Think GB3 will succeed without Bill? Not financially, that's irrelevant. But story wise, comedic wise, etc. Think they can make a new GB movie and make it great without the talents of Mr. Murray?
http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a ... urray.html
“Yes, we will be doing the movie and hopefully with Mr. Murray," Aykroyd said, notably using the formal surname to let him know he’s angry, or maybe just disappointed. "That is our hope.” However, Aykroyd admonished, “What we have to remember is that Ghostbusters is bigger than any one component—although Billy was absolutely the lead and contributive to it in a massive way, as was the director and Harold [Ramis], myself, and Sigourney [Weaver]. The concept is much larger than any individual role and the promise of Ghostbusters 3 is that we get to hand the equipment and the franchise down to new blood."He goes on to say that he's blind in one eye and bad knee, and Egon (Harold) is too fat. So they'll be passing on the equipment to fresh meat.
Think GB3 will succeed without Bill? Not financially, that's irrelevant. But story wise, comedic wise, etc. Think they can make a new GB movie and make it great without the talents of Mr. Murray?