Return to Home Page - Ghostbusters Fans
    


View new posts | View your posts PLEASE let's NOT knock Bill Murray!!!

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 10:16 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: October 12th, 2009, 3:27 pm
Posts: 3802
Location: Denver, CO
Karma: 462
OMG!!! IT HAPPENED!!!! IT FINALLY HAPPENED!!!!!! TELL EVERYONE!!!!!! GHOSTBUSTERS 3 IS FINALLY COMING!!!!!

http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/04/01/bi ... busters-4/

_________________
For Sale:
Bigi330 Pack Shells & Motherboards - viewtopic.php?f=31&t=28496
Aluminum "Hero" Pack Parts - viewtopic.php?f=31&t=28735
Want to commission me? - viewtopic.php?f=31&t=31764
Image


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 11:32 am 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: January 5th, 2002, 5:00 pm
Posts: 750
Location: USA
Karma: 0
On April first no doubt?


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 11:55 am 
Offline
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
User avatar

Joined: October 2nd, 2009, 5:28 pm
Posts: 340
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Karma: 17
Cyland Props wrote:
On April first no doubt?

Image

_________________
Is peculiar time. The ghost will amock. He will save us?
The Men Who Do The Bust Ghosts!
Is funny film. Such good time.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 12:49 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead
User avatar

Joined: January 15th, 2003, 12:58 am
Posts: 711
Location: SanDiego, CA
Karma: 59
thabooglio, you never have anything useful to contribute. Somehow you don't really notice the way you're ignored after most everything you say around here. Some have a longer learning curve than most.


Raystantz Italy, thanks for the input from Sony. Yeah, we probably shouldn't bother them about this. A good part of the trust we have with their community comes from good relations, and good relations sometimes means being selective about when/why we contact them.

If anything his statement seems to indicate to me that Sony's determined to make this movie whether the 4th rightsholder ( Murray ) signs off on it or not. My guess is he won't sign off, it will get made anyways, and Murray's money comes through the lawsuit he files against Sony, not through actually appearing in any GB3 movie.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 1:11 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead
User avatar

Joined: February 12th, 2008, 12:31 pm
Posts: 417
Location: Baltimore, MARYLAND
Karma: 88
GOSTBUSTR'S 3 ITS SRS BIDNESS!!

_________________
TheRockman wrote:
At this point they're becoming so common, I'm expecting someone to post a thread on how to convert a Matty PKE into a shoe polisher.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 1:20 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead
User avatar

Joined: February 12th, 2008, 12:31 pm
Posts: 417
Location: Baltimore, MARYLAND
Karma: 88
Image

_________________
TheRockman wrote:
At this point they're becoming so common, I'm expecting someone to post a thread on how to convert a Matty PKE into a shoe polisher.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 2:09 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: October 26th, 2007, 3:29 pm
Posts: 588
Location: Kent State University, Ohio
Karma: 0
Vincenzo330 wrote:
Raystantz Italy wrote:
i think that internet is overblowing this.
Murray playing Roosevelt is not official: there was an article where they say that the studio is trying to have Murray...and the other sites have jumped the gun a bit and are now saying that GB3 is dead because Murray has agreed to do the FDR movie, rumor that nor the studio nor the producers have cleared.


You mean kinda like EVERY SINGLE RUMOR YOU'VE POSTED SO FAR???

Image

_________________
(23:06:06) protonpack24: i HATE YOU MOTHER f**** SON OF A BTHCHES EXEPT THE GOOD PEOPLE LIKE KIND 2311 OR VELVET
(15:19:06) kind2311: my face, mouth more specifically, has been known as the cockpit round these parts for years

(00:41:11) AJ_Quick: But...
(00:41:17) AJ_Quick: They are also making dreams.
(00:41:21) AJ_Quick: Dreams COME TRUE.
(00:41:27) AJ_Quick: For the child in all of us.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 2:19 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead
User avatar

Joined: January 15th, 2003, 12:58 am
Posts: 711
Location: SanDiego, CA
Karma: 59
(facepalm)

thabooglio....

1) You PM'd me about an issue.

2) I PM'd you back saying I keep all these discussions in the open for transparency. If you got a beef with me, make it public on the thread you're talking about.

3) ....and then you PM'd me back to keep it going but claimed it was an olive branch.

Man, you just don't get it. Put it out here for everyone to see and rest assured I'll respond to it. You're trying to convince me you're not an idiot but then you do this. Go figure.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 2:22 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead
User avatar

Joined: May 8th, 2009, 1:05 pm
Posts: 3807
Location: Flaw-duh
Karma: 208
actually taking it to a pm and keeping it a pm is the best way to do it. you saw how devilmanozzy was treated after he publicly posted a pm i sent to him for derailing a thread that was completely not about him and his poor artistic "skill" and his social retardation.

_________________
Want to play with the big kids?
Want to join a franchise but none around? Want to join a franchise and there's already one that wont let you in because you dont have any equipment? screw that malarky; Join GB:The LeftOvers
My FOR SALE thread
My WANTED thread


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 1st, 2011, 2:25 pm 
Offline
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
User avatar

Joined: October 2nd, 2009, 5:28 pm
Posts: 340
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Karma: 17
Fifthrider wrote:
(facepalm)

thabooglio....

1) You PM'd me about an issue.

2) I PM'd you back saying I keep all these discussions in the open for transparency. If you got a beef with me, make it public on the thread you're talking about.

3) ....and then you PM'd me back to keep it going but claimed it was an olive branch.

Man, you just don't get it. Put it out here for everyone to see and rest assured I'll respond to it. You're trying to convince me you're not an idiot but then you do this. Go figure.


Ok, here it is out for everyone to see a disagreement between two people that NO ONE ELSE IS INVOLVED IN!

1. You came in out of nowhere in a thread that was (let's face it) kinda goofy, and decided to insult me. My mistake for thinking that in order to be here I had to contribute. I must have missed that when I created my account.

2. I took it to you in a PM. Why? Well, if I have to restate myself it was because what ever beef you have with me is nobody's business but yours and mine.

3. You responded in an oddly cryptic way. I deleted it, but I bet you still have it. Go ahead and show everyone a PM that wasn't intended for them.

4. I tried to explain myself further. Since you responded to my PRIVATE MESSAGE in PRIVATE, I naturally thought you would do the same. MY MISTAKE.

5. Instead of talking it out, you bring it here and drag me through the mud. Nice job you did.



And of course, I'm the idiot. Take in mind that I didn't fire the first shot, that was all you. I didn't want to have a problem with anyone here. I wanted to at least try to make amends. Thanks for shooting that down here too.



There. All out in the open! Happy?

And to anyone else who wasn't part of this conversation; I have been a member for about two years and I have only felt welcome by everyone here. And if I have offended you in any way (You know besides rearing my ugly mug) just let me know.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 4th, 2011, 1:15 am 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 6:07 pm
Posts: 217
Location: MI
Karma: 0
Here's my view on the whole Bill thing:

He looks at Ghostbusters as a classic. He did the sequel because he wanted to make another classic, but it turned out to be the same thing and he felt the franchise was tainted a little.

Now that he's older, he's been doing a lot of art films and dramas. He probably looks at GB3 as a "cash-in" for the studios and doesn't believe it's "pure." Therefore, he's not sure if he wants to do it because it might come out as GB2.

It still pisses me off though. Just do it Bill. :(

_________________
Image


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 4th, 2011, 9:32 am 
Offline
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
User avatar

Joined: November 7th, 2010, 9:26 pm
Posts: 1330
Location: Salem, MA
Karma: 224
Fifthrider wrote:
(facepalm)

thabooglio....

1) You PM'd me about an issue.

2) I PM'd you back saying I keep all these discussions in the open for transparency. If you got a beef with me, make it public on the thread you're talking about.

3) ....and then you PM'd me back to keep it going but claimed it was an olive branch.

Man, you just don't get it. Put it out here for everyone to see and rest assured I'll respond to it. You're trying to convince me you're not an idiot but then you do this. Go figure.


Dude, check your forum etiquette there - what's said in a PM stays in a PM. No one wants to read your nonsense argument - keep it private.

_________________
Image

Because you asked, more of me: http://www.megatoothpastemammals.com


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 4th, 2011, 11:54 am 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: January 5th, 2002, 5:00 pm
Posts: 750
Location: USA
Karma: 0
Mike_D wrote:
Here's my view on the whole Bill thing:

He looks at Ghostbusters as a classic. He did the sequel because he wanted to make another classic, but it turned out to be the same thing and he felt the franchise was tainted a little.

Now that he's older, he's been doing a lot of art films and dramas. He probably looks at GB3 as a "cash-in" for the studios and doesn't believe it's "pure." Therefore, he's not sure if he wants to do it because it might come out as GB2.

It still pisses me off though. Just do it Bill. :(



I read in an interview with Bill or at least an artical about Bill that at the time after Ghostbusters he was feeling a bit over exposed and wanted to tone it back a little. I got the impression that he suffers from depression or some sort of anxiety which would explain his mood swings.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 4th, 2011, 2:11 pm 
Offline
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
User avatar

Joined: January 5th, 2002, 5:00 pm
Posts: 2474
Location: FLORIDA
Karma: 13
Ghostbusters 3 isn't going to happen because the architect was destroyed in GB 2.5
The world is safe from evil ghosts.


(-0 / +1)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: April 4th, 2011, 9:50 pm 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: February 9th, 2009, 12:40 am
Posts: 122
Location: Brandon, MANITOBA
Karma: 1
New people die every day..... :P :P


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: September 14th, 2011, 1:09 am 
Offline
Ghosthead

Joined: February 8th, 2009, 10:12 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Sandusky, OHIO
Karma: 0
Mike_D wrote:
Here's my view on the whole Bill thing:

He looks at Ghostbusters as a classic. He did the sequel because he wanted to make another classic, but it turned out to be the same thing and he felt the franchise was tainted a little.

Now that he's older, he's been doing a lot of art films and dramas. He probably looks at GB3 as a "cash-in" for the studios and doesn't believe it's "pure." Therefore, he's not sure if he wants to do it because it might come out as GB2.

It still pisses me off though. Just do it Bill. :(



I'm not so sure he does. He only did the movie to get "the Razor's Edge" greenlit. When that movie bombed, he took a four year sabbatical, came back, did Ghostbusters II, and that underperformed compared to the first movie.

With Billy, you can never tell if he really loves the franchise or whether he's just toying with people.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: September 19th, 2011, 6:41 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: September 3rd, 2011, 8:18 am
Posts: 30
Karma: 0
While I'm not directly involved with hollywood and I'm nothing more than a fan like the rest of you I have to say that while I love the idea of a Ghostbusters 3 if it were made I don't see it helping the franchise as we know.

I have 2 different theories due to the fact that I don't fully understand Murray's contract. Is it that ANY gb sequel will need his approval to be made or that only GB 3 hangs on him.

If it is is former then I see GB 3 just being a movie that makes us want a 4th seeing as it will create new heroes to root for (this is being the most positive if the movie is good) but then having to wait for a 4th because of Murray yet again.

The second is that they make the 3rd, do it half assed because really the only reason they want to make it is to get it out of Murray's control, then they will just reboot the series 2-3 years later with an all new cast, new concept and it will be more supernatural action and less comedy.

I mean this is Sony, a company that rebooted Spiderman after less than 10 years.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 16th, 2011, 5:29 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: September 22nd, 2011, 1:31 am
Posts: 17
Karma: 0
For a dude that hates sequals and everyone thinks he doesn't want to do the new one....He did do the video game...right.

Im pretty sure if they do a GB3 he'll be involved.


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 18th, 2011, 5:00 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: October 18th, 2011, 4:46 pm
Posts: 5
Karma: 0
Bill is going to do the ghostbuster 3 movie I talk to some head movie people in hollywood the other day but they told me not to tell. yah right!!!

_________________
Join the fastest growing ghostbusters 3 fanpage http://www.facebook.com/Ghostbusters3.0


(-0 / +0)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Share On: Share on Facebook Facebook Share on Twitter Twitter Share on Sonico Sonico Share on FriendFeed FriendFeed Share on Orkut Orkut Share on Digg Digg Share on MySpace MySpace Share on Delicious Delicious Share on Technorati Technorati Share on Tumblr TumblrShare on Google+ Google+


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: KyleS, Lundo12, Polly, Wiz-GB008 and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Facebook connect for phpBB by SVmods
 
© 1998-2011 Ghostbusters Fans & Ghostbusters Prop Archive - Created and Written by AJ Quick
"Ghostbusters" and "Ghost-Design" are registered Trademarks of Columbia Pictures Industries Inc.
Send Ghostbusters Fans an Email - webmaster@gbfans.com - The Largest FIRST Robotics Archive - Jurassic Jeep - 65 Million Years in the Making - A. Quick CNC - 3 Axis Hobby CNC Routers