https://1428elm.com/2017/09/28/hocus-po ... inal-cast/
Even Buzzfeed jumped on the bandwagon:
me (with new mullet): oh i know where the party is
You'll need to forgive me, I'm not seeing the "ATC reactions", all I am seeing is some reactions that don't have anything to do with Ghostbusters or the 2016 movie.You are forgiven, reactions are because a beloved film is being remade after year of wanting a sequel.
and I think Marvel is rather idiotic by not trying to re introduce The Meteor Man along side Black Panther.The one with the cowardly school teacher getting powers after he's hit by a meteor? I fail to see the point in bringing that into the Marvel cinematic universe.
It is a Marvel property.Eh, not exactly. Marvel published a comic based on the film, but it's not really a Marvel property. There was never an actual comic before that, the idea came from the film. Kind of like DC publishing a Demolition Man comic, it doesn't mean DC owns the property. MGM would more than likely own it. Even if they didn't, there's little to no reason to put such an obscure character into that universe.
I've edited the title of the thread as there was no reason to bring the reboot into it.But there was a reason to bring the reboot into the star wars thread? lmao. This movie has a huge fan base and people are outraged (including the cast) that it's being rebooted. Same thing happened with ATC. But whatever fits your agenda I suppose.
But whatever fits your agenda I suppose.It was limited similarity, and it certainly didn't need to be referenced in the thread title. By removing the reference the thread could've been considered by prospective forum posters without the taint of a possible anti-reboot agenda.
I think we could have a little more ghost busting […]
This is bigger than the microchip!!
Oh, we're playing the new drinking game Article ![…]