I liked how they showed a bunch of topless Chris Hemsworth photos when they started talking about him.
- May 25th, 2016, 2:59 pm#4865257
EddieSpenser liked this
This post may contain an affiliate link that helps support GBFans.com when you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
Check out my ghost hunting documentary!!
A Haunting in Hinsdalenow on Amazon!
And now FREE on Tubi!!!
Check out my ghost hunting documentary!!
A Haunting in Hinsdalenow on Amazon!
And now FREE on Tubi!!!
- May 25th, 2016, 3:15 pm#4865259
We want gender equality, not a world where sex does not exist.
For Ivan.
- May 25th, 2016, 3:49 pm#4865263
Oh, but Thor is also a really talented guy....so talented that we can overlook a lil objectification.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristinchirico ... .bjgYeAjm7
https://www.buzzfeed.com/kristinchirico ... .bjgYeAjm7
- May 25th, 2016, 5:43 pm#4865268
featofstrength wrote:so talented that we can overlook a lil objectification.We've not had the greatest history when it came to objectification, anyone remember the "sexy Ghostbusters calendar"?
Travis Burrell liked this
- May 25th, 2016, 6:22 pm#4865277
This whole segment was very funny. Also, if you're an adult male complaining about the objectification of Chris Hemsworth as it relates to Ghostbusters..I promise you, you're part of the problem.
My GB1 Pack Build---http://www.gbfans.com/community/viewtop ... =2&t=36244
My Uniform and Props Thread--http://www.gbfans.com/community/viewtop ... 0#p4797540
My Uniform and Props Thread--http://www.gbfans.com/community/viewtop ... 0#p4797540
- May 25th, 2016, 6:30 pm#4865278
Because cutting holes in pictures of Kristen Wiig is time consuming when you're ready to go.
Kingpin wrote:I missed that one. Did they ever make the full sized real doll of this:featofstrength wrote:so talented that we can overlook a lil objectification.We've not had the greatest history when it came to objectification, anyone remember the "sexy Ghostbusters calendar"?
Because cutting holes in pictures of Kristen Wiig is time consuming when you're ready to go.
- May 25th, 2016, 9:10 pm#4865286
What problem is that? Objectification of women isn't okay but it is if it's a man? You gotta love those double standards. Throwing "sexism" around is all fine and dandy when people criticize the reboot but it gets ignored when it's reversed.
CraigTHEOWL1 wrote:This whole segment was very funny. Also, if you're an adult male complaining about the objectification of Chris Hemsworth as it relates to Ghostbusters..I promise you, you're part of the problem.
What problem is that? Objectification of women isn't okay but it is if it's a man? You gotta love those double standards. Throwing "sexism" around is all fine and dandy when people criticize the reboot but it gets ignored when it's reversed.
This post may contain an affiliate link that helps support GBFans.com when you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
Check out my ghost hunting documentary!!
A Haunting in Hinsdalenow on Amazon!
And now FREE on Tubi!!!
Check out my ghost hunting documentary!!
A Haunting in Hinsdalenow on Amazon!
And now FREE on Tubi!!!
- May 26th, 2016, 3:15 am#4865298
featofstrength wrote:Yes they did [emoji6]
I missed that one. Did they ever make the full sized real doll of this:
EddieSpenser liked this
Ghostbusters Academy: To Investigate And Eliminate
- May 26th, 2016, 4:01 am#4865299
Christ on a cross...
Were there any clips of the film shown during the segment, or was it just still shots?
Were there any clips of the film shown during the segment, or was it just still shots?
- May 26th, 2016, 4:35 am#4865300
Kingpin wrote:Were there any clips of the film shown during the segment, or was it just still shots?Both. The 'stock' Kevin pointing from the desk still, the first all 4 Ghostbusters still -- then the second domestic trailer during a commercial break then parts of the same domestic trailer when the show returned from a break. No new stills or footage. No real new info unless you count they played Head's Up a lot during night shoots. It was more the soft interview before the flood of talk shows, entertainment show snippets, press junkets in June and July. Still a lot of laughs. I liked when they critiqued their own action figures - for instance, McKinnon said out of the blue that hers was not accurate because it was missing pit stains.
- May 26th, 2016, 9:04 am#4865315
I honestly found the interview really funny. And it won't matter to those that are already spreading these obviously BS false rumors anyway... but that interview makes it pretty obvious that these actresses do NOT hate each other and I find it very unlikely that they fought on set. It's pretty clear they enjoy each other's company and have a lot of fun together.
Like The Buffalo Ghostbusters on Facebook!
- May 26th, 2016, 10:02 am#4865321
sorry guys. Throwing out a politician isn't exactly going to convince me to jump on board. I already plan on seeing this movie when it hits the dollar theater. I can't stand Hillary. Never have been able to.
- May 26th, 2016, 10:33 am#4865322
Doctor Venkman wrote:I honestly found the interview really funny. And it won't matter to those that are already spreading these obviously BS false rumors anyway... but that interview makes it pretty obvious that these actresses do NOT hate each other and I find it very unlikely that they fought on set. It's pretty clear they enjoy each other's company and have a lot of fun together.Dan Aykroyd is very handsome with fans and press in his CH vodka tours when the press is flashing and recording. Behind the scenes he was raging like a mad lunatic because his assistant didn't opened his door.
why don't you all go away!!!!!!!
- May 26th, 2016, 5:10 pm#4865351
Do you think it's a deliberate choice to give the sexy shirtless bit to the good looking guy instead of a hot girl?
Is it intentional/coincidence that 1 in 5 movieparts are female, with the hot female being cast as the sexy love interest, and those numbers happen to be reversed in this movie?
It's a statement.
Edit: also, I'm quite happy to report the Scientology bit with Lesli was hilarious to me and she did not even have to shout or look angry.
SpaceBallz wrote:Both are wrong, but both can be OK when in the right context. When it's meant to be funny for example, or to make a statement.CraigTHEOWL1 wrote:This whole segment was very funny. Also, if you're an adult male complaining about the objectification of Chris Hemsworth as it relates to Ghostbusters..I promise you, you're part of the problem.
What problem is that? Objectification of women isn't okay but it is if it's a man? You gotta love those double standards. Throwing "sexism" around is all fine and dandy when people criticize the reboot but it gets ignored when it's reversed.
Do you think it's a deliberate choice to give the sexy shirtless bit to the good looking guy instead of a hot girl?
Is it intentional/coincidence that 1 in 5 movieparts are female, with the hot female being cast as the sexy love interest, and those numbers happen to be reversed in this movie?
It's a statement.
Edit: also, I'm quite happy to report the Scientology bit with Lesli was hilarious to me and she did not even have to shout or look angry.
Travis Burrell liked this
For Ivan.
- May 27th, 2016, 6:51 am#4865390
Even if it is true, that doesn't make the rumors anything more concrete than what they are... rumors. If you want to believe that the actresses don't get along after working together on multiple projects and after interviews where they seem to have a lot of fun together, that's entirely your choice, and that's fine. I don't see it that way though.
Raystantz Italy wrote:Were you present for this raging? I've never heard of anything like this with Dan Aykroyd.Doctor Venkman wrote:I honestly found the interview really funny. And it won't matter to those that are already spreading these obviously BS false rumors anyway... but that interview makes it pretty obvious that these actresses do NOT hate each other and I find it very unlikely that they fought on set. It's pretty clear they enjoy each other's company and have a lot of fun together.Dan Aykroyd is very handsome with fans and press in his CH vodka tours when the press is flashing and recording. Behind the scenes he was raging like a mad lunatic because his assistant didn't opened his door.
Even if it is true, that doesn't make the rumors anything more concrete than what they are... rumors. If you want to believe that the actresses don't get along after working together on multiple projects and after interviews where they seem to have a lot of fun together, that's entirely your choice, and that's fine. I don't see it that way though.
Like The Buffalo Ghostbusters on Facebook!
- May 27th, 2016, 6:58 am#4865392
Raystantz Italy wrote:Behind the scenesBehind the scenes, people are human. It's not as simple as "on camera = nice, off camera = nasty."
"You forgot the first rule of fanatics. When you become obsessed with the enemy...you become the enemy."
- May 27th, 2016, 7:36 am#4865396
They are "actors". Professional's doing what they are directed to do. They can be one thing on set and totally another in real life. They are promoting the movie to earn their pay check so of course they are going to be all warm and friendly on the set of Ellen. I'm not saying they didn't get along while on set.
I just read an article about the movie Fury where the director actually told his cast to have fist fights with another. It probably didn't get that extreme on the set of Ghostbusters.
There was also the episode of Rosie O donnel freaking out in her dressing room on the view after being questioned by Elisabeth Hasslebeck way back when. It seemed like they were getting along until that point. Actors can treat each other like crap on set and still make the appearance they like each other in real life.
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-Brad ... 67698.html
I just read an article about the movie Fury where the director actually told his cast to have fist fights with another. It probably didn't get that extreme on the set of Ghostbusters.
There was also the episode of Rosie O donnel freaking out in her dressing room on the view after being questioned by Elisabeth Hasslebeck way back when. It seemed like they were getting along until that point. Actors can treat each other like crap on set and still make the appearance they like each other in real life.
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-Brad ... 67698.html
pferreira1983, SpaceBallz liked this
- May 27th, 2016, 7:46 am#4865397
timeware wrote:They are promoting the movie to earn their pay check so of course they are going to be all warm and friendly on the set of Ellen.Sure, it's a job, it's professionalism. Just saying, audiences are often a little too quick to interpret that as "Oh it's all a lie." (Not saying you were doing that.)
"You forgot the first rule of fanatics. When you become obsessed with the enemy...you become the enemy."
- May 27th, 2016, 8:08 am#4865401
I was present. Looked a bit like his Bass-O Matic sketch.
why don't you all go away!!!!!!!
- May 27th, 2016, 8:34 am#4865404
Anyone who doesn't think this movie is part of a larger agenda is in total denial. You don't parade out old dogface without an agenda attached.
"Doctor... Venkman. The purpose of science is to serve mankind. You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle. Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist, Dr. Venkman!" - Dean Yeager
"No, no, no. You are a talking monkey on a spinning ball, floating through infinity. You f*ckhead" - Joe Rogan
"No, no, no. You are a talking monkey on a spinning ball, floating through infinity. You f*ckhead" - Joe Rogan
- May 27th, 2016, 8:45 am#4865405
The marketing department has an agenda, no doubt. It's called making money.
There is only one conspiracy in this country and it's called Capitalism.
There is only one conspiracy in this country and it's called Capitalism.
"You forgot the first rule of fanatics. When you become obsessed with the enemy...you become the enemy."
- May 27th, 2016, 10:35 am#4865412
Cognitive dissonance is a terrible thing. Sorry bud.
"Doctor... Venkman. The purpose of science is to serve mankind. You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle. Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist, Dr. Venkman!" - Dean Yeager
"No, no, no. You are a talking monkey on a spinning ball, floating through infinity. You f*ckhead" - Joe Rogan
"No, no, no. You are a talking monkey on a spinning ball, floating through infinity. You f*ckhead" - Joe Rogan
- May 28th, 2016, 5:33 pm#4865516
Alphagaia wrote:Girls don't normally take their tops off in family movies.
Both are wrong, but both can be OK when in the right context. When it's meant to be funny for example, or to make a statement.
Do you think it's a deliberate choice to give the sexy shirtless bit to the good looking guy instead of a hot girl?
Is it intentional/coincidence that 1 in 5 movieparts are female, with the hot female being cast as the sexy love interest, and those numbers happen to be reversed in this movie?
It's a statement.
- May 28th, 2016, 5:35 pm#4865517
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... urposeful/
JurorNo.2 wrote:The marketing department has an agenda, no doubt. It's called making money.Tell that to Disney:
There is only one conspiracy in this country and it's called Capitalism.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... urposeful/
Scum liked this
- May 28th, 2016, 5:36 pm#4865518
Alphagaia wrote:We want gender equality, not a world where sex does not exist.Sex does exist. Google Pornhub.
- May 29th, 2016, 2:23 pm#4865598
pferreira1983 wrote:I own stock in Disney. Believe me, they already know.JurorNo.2 wrote:Tell that to Disney:
pferreira1983 liked this
"You forgot the first rule of fanatics. When you become obsessed with the enemy...you become the enemy."
- June 3rd, 2016, 5:45 am#4866116
For anyone in the UK, this episode is being shown on ITV2 today I believe.....just a heads up
I'd really like to see the new t-shirt unlocks t[…]
My Little Pony/Ghostbusters crossover done by my d[…]
Great work identifying the RS Temperature Control […]