Discuss the Ghostbusters movie that was released in 2016.
#4874553
So I've been a life long fan of the franchise since seeing the 1st film as a small child in the 80's. I grew up through all of the hopeful years and rumors of a possible GB3 getting made, just to deal with the sadness of Murray dropping the ball due to the claims or a poorly written script. Then "Ghostbusters 2016" pops into the picture and everyone is onboard, including Murray with nothing but praise. After having seen the new film I can't help but have some strong feelings about it, pretty much all of them being that I think the movie was a giant stinking pile of crap for an assortment of reasons. With this being said, my question to all of you is this...

Do you think all of the previously written GB3 scripts were literally that terrible that Murray wouldn't do them?

I just have a really hard time believing that a script or film could have been done any more poorly than what was done for Ghostbusters 2016, and for Murray to think that this movie was a good idea and to appear in it for a longer duration than any other actor from the original is just mind boggling to me. I cant help but feel like Mr. Stay Puft has kicked us all in the junk repeatedly!
#4874582
He didn't really do that much in Vice Principals, though. Looked like he enjoyed his character more in GB16 more, though, and liked to ham it up.

I've heard from those that read them that some of those scripts were really bad. Then again, I don't agree at all with your assessment of the new film. I think Murray didn't want to hurt the original more than GB2 did. This new film was Ghostbusters, but it took it in a different direction, he like the actresses, and decided to be a part of it. And he liked the finished product, too.
#4874597
I don't think all the GB3 scripts were flat-out terrible, though I'm sure some might have been. I just honestly believe Bill wants distance from the franchise and has for a while. It would've taken something unrealistically great for a sequel to get him back in that flightsuit for a full movie. He doesn't seem like the type of actor who likes being wrangled back in for the same same thing over and over again and he seems to have decided as he's gotten older that hes just going to do things his way.

An article that just came out recently about the game showed that Terminal Reality had to go so far as replacing the original mayor with Bill's brother Brian in the hopes of convincing Brian so that he could pass along the word to Bill because Bill was unresponsive. Then when they did get him he only showed up for two days of recording. While it's nice to hear Bill's voice, there is no doubt in my mind that a lot of the dialogue in that game feels phoned in. I also don't doubt that Sony put pressure on him to get him to cameo for GB16 and that also feels phoned it.
#4874599
J10kmn wrote:I don't think all the GB3 scripts were flat-out terrible, though I'm sure some might have been. I just honestly believe Bill wants distance from the franchise and has for a while. It would've taken something unrealistically great for a sequel to get him back in that flightsuit for a full movie. He doesn't seem like the type of actor who likes being wrangled back in for the same same thing over and over again and he seems to have decided as he's gotten older that hes just going to do things his way.

An article that just came out recently about the game showed that Terminal Reality had to go so far as replacing the original mayor with Bill's brother Brian in the hopes of convincing Brian so that he could pass along the word to Bill because Bill was unresponsive. Then when they did get him he only showed up for two days of recording. While it's nice to hear Bill's voice, there is no doubt in my mind that a lot of the dialogue in that game feels phoned in. I also don't doubt that Sony put pressure on him to get him to cameo for GB16 and that also feels phoned it.
I agree, Bill's performance in the video game was by far the weakest of the original four. His performance in the new movie was embarrassing. He should have allowed them to make Ghostbusters 3 with an up and coming star stepping into his role in the 90's if he wasn't into it.
pferreira1983 liked this
#4874608
Weird, maybe it's because I was not looking because I liked the film, but I saw no problem with the portrayal of Bills cameo. It did not seem as lacklustre as his voice work on the videogame.

I've seen him vouch for the movie and the ladies a few times.

On top of that, if Bill did not attend the premiere that could be seen as a silent protest, but it could also just be one of Bills Famous No Shows, or him being busy like Chris Hemsworth who also did not show up, because he was busy with the new Thor movie.

He only did GB to do a movie he really wanted to do, which bombed. He did GB2 after a lot of pressure, and was not happy with the result. Bill seems the kind of guy who hates to be pressured into a project, and only does what he wants to do. It looks like GB was a surprise hit he never really stood behind, but I could be wrong.
Sav C, MonaLS liked this
#4874612
Well, maybe he shouldn't be signing contracts if he doesn't want to be pressured into following through with them. He only did GB16 because he didn't have to reprise the Venkman character and he knew the media had been reporting that he's been "shredding scripts" and refusing to do a new film.
pferreira1983 liked this
#4874619
Bill's cameo was the weakest, I agree. You can tell based on Paul Feig's interview with deadline.com that Bill barely wanted to be involved. He hung up on Feig without even saying a word. He had Jon Hamm waiting in the wings because they weren't sure if he was going to show up.

I'm so conflicted. I think Bill really hurt Ivan & Dan's feelings. Read Ivan's interview with Drew Mcweeny over at Hitfix. You can sense his regret. Bill does all kinds of bad films, he couldn't do Ghostbusters 3 just as a favour to Ivan & Danny? Or the fans? He and Dan are friends. Dan even said on Howard Stern that he probably won't ever work with Bill again because of this. He said they will always be friends but business wise? They are done. He wouldn't read the script! Every time Ivan or Dan tried talking to him about it? Well read the hitfix interview. I know he doesn't owe anybody anything but just out of decency? Ghostbusters helped make him what he is today. Christ he even did the video game for barely any money at all! I'll always be a Murray fan. But this hurts. Finding out how they were waiting and waiting on him and then Harold got sick.
Have you seen a Rock the Kasbah? My god it's bad! Yet he did that over GB3.
JurorNo.2 liked this
#4874623
Alphagaia wrote:Wasn't that whole shredding the script a fabrication by the way?
Yes, it was fabricated by the National Enquirer. Dan even said it wasn't true and that Bill wouldn't do something like that.
RichardLess wrote:Have you seen a Rock the Kasbah? My god it's bad! Yet he did that over GB3.
Yeah, I saw it. It was pretty bad. Not terrible, but not good. I like Bill and Bruce Willis, so it wasn't a complete waste of time.
#4874628
What would get me chuckling is, pending a sequel gets made, they reveal it was secretly canon all along and
This Post Contains Spoilers
In doing so they would have managed to get Bill to reprise his role without even knowing.

Far fetched, I know, but it's fun to think about.
Sav C liked this
#4874635
Jangonate wrote:What would get me chuckling is, pending a sequel gets made, they reveal it was secretly canon all along and
This Post Contains Spoilers
In doing so they would have managed to get Bill to reprise his role without even knowing.

Far fetched, I know, but it's fun to think about.
I would be okay with a passing the baton movie thanks.
#4874677
Ivo Shandor wrote:Proposed GB3 plot - Aykroyd & Ramis..."Manhattan Hell"...sounded bad.
I read part of it, and didn't really like it that much. I'm not huge on the idea of adding new Ghostbusters to the original canon, and even if they did make GB3 now, I'd want it to be only Stantz, Venkman, and Winston (of course Louis could be a 'buster too.)

Personally I'm very happy where they ended the series with NYC celebrating the Ghostbusters, and that great shot of Ms. Liberty with Lower Manhattan in the background. :)
#4874693
To answer the original question, I don't know if Hellbent was bad but it was probably too fantasy driven and high concept like Ghost Smashers and The Seed but I think maybe 1 or 2 of the later scripts were probably good enough. I would have been fine with Peter and Egon being written out, more of a spotlight on Ray and Winston, and a new team.
Ivo Shandor wrote:Aykroyd & Ramis captured lightning in a bottle with GB1. After that (at least for me) it's dubious.

GB2 - Aykroyd & Ramis....hit or miss.
Proposed GB3 plot - Aykroyd & Ramis..."Manhattan Hell"...sounded bad.
Video Game - Aykroyd & Ramis...I'm not a fan. Hit or miss at best.
Actually, Hellbent was just Aykroyd for the 1st draft then Aykroyd and the late Tom Davis on at least one subsequent draft. The later GB3 scripts, Ramis was involved along with Reitman and Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky then Etan Cohen.

The Video Game wasn't primarily Aykroyd and Ramis despite the end credits. It was mostly John Zuur Platten and Flint Dille. The story idea and initial development I guess is John Melchior and Drew Haworth from Vivendi then the script was by Platten and Dille (who did 4 drafts), Patrick Hegarty added some dialogue at some point, Aykroyd & Ramis consulted on things like the terminology and polish and gave some notes to Platten and Dille. I was happy with TVG being the last thing from the prime canon -- the birth of a new franchise.
Sav C, GBPaulRivera liked this
#4875328
I just get the impression Murray didn't want GB to be his big legacy, he wanted more of a drama like Razor's Edge or Lost in Translation. I'm thinking of some New York Times reviews from years back, implying what the guys were doing in GB wasn't great acting. I disagree with NYT of course, but I can understand why comments like that might sting a performer.
Sav C liked this
#4875401
I've become less and less of a Bill Murray fan as time has gone on and he continually sabotaged GB3.

I didn't like him wearing GB suit and gear at the awards show, I didn't like him re-enacting GB scenes in Zombieland.

Those things would be cool if he weren't stopping all development on GB3 at the same time. It seemed to me he was taking a poke at fans (us) who wanted GB3. Maybe that's not true, but that's how I took it.

I didn't smile or react when I saw his cameo in ATC. I liked when he got thrown out the window. :)

I don't want to agree with Chevy Chase when he said Murray was just a cheap John Belushi replacement...but that does apply to GB as much as SNL which Chase was talking about.

Venkman was originally written for Belushi I believe.
#4880903
Based on his own account he didn't really read the scripts for GB3.

Look at it a different way: it's not so much that he was resistant to the franchise or the idea of it, but he was resistant to the idea of what it meant to Sony. Even without Ivan and Dan and Ghost Corps, there was always going to be a desire to make Ghostbusters into a major cottage industry, which would've been a homegrown Sony thing, unlike Spider-Man or James Bond.

The way it is, Bill did a day on the new movie and a day on Kimmel and that was his whole commitment. Had he been the star of a new movie, even if he had really restrictive press guidelines and whatnot, and even if he loved the movie and it was great, he would still have no choice to be at the heart of this piece of corporate machinery where people are counting on you to be places and do things and make the rounds, and I think that more than anything was what was unappealing to him. It's a pressure that he has to shoulder that involves lots of business, and for a movie that he holds up as being very good, which already has one sequel he isn't a fan of, and which would also require a ton of tedious technical work involving special effects and everything that he probably wasn't very interested in. Taken all together, it's not as easy as just doing someone a favor. The favor takes a year and a ton of effort and energy and is a gamble.
GBPaulRivera liked this
#4881156
I dont think it was Bill as much as it was the 'higher ups'. From what i can gather, they were all pretty close to a greenlight for a real GB3 (GB: Alive Again), Amy Pascal was holding up because she wanted to jump on the 'reboot/remake' bandwagon for the past few years with the property, and was waiting for Ivan to step down from director in order to have control back.

from what i've read, Bill has a infamous reluctance on set for EVERY movie. I never bought the 'blame Murray for No GB3" stuff.

I do believe if they finally got the ball rolling on a real GB3, he would've came back, somehow someway, even if for a light cameo.

Ivan Reitman always mentions he didnt even know Bill was going to show up for Meatballs back in 78-79.

As for not reading any of the Gb3 drafts...well, when has Bill's lines ever been from the script? ;-)
Sav C, MonaLS liked this
#4881183
I really like Bill's cameo in the new movie. It doesn't feel phoned in to me. Now Bill's performance in TVG, that is what I call phoned in.
#4881208
Sav C wrote:They said he phoned in lines for Ghostbusters II. I guess if anyone can pull off phoning in lines it's Bill Murray.
See that I don't get. I mean look at this expression when Janosz first introduces himself, Murray's not phoning anything in, lol.
Sav C liked this
Uniform Tips

It does rain frequently here in London, but not to[…]

Hasbro Ghostbusters

It could have been more accurate (barrel and[…]

The yellow parts are raw 3D prints, unsanded and u[…]

Sorry, I hadn't seen any of these replies. Either […]