JurorNo.2 wrote:It's comedy. Someone has to be belittled, lol. And it's hardly the first time in the history of the planet that the joke has been on men. It's not the jokes that have changed, it's the audience. You guys are basically using a form of political correctness against the movie, dictating which protected group can't be made fun of.
No I'm saying it has no place in this movie franchise and I would think the films could be a bit more intelligent than that.
Alphagaia wrote:This really should be obvious.
I agree it should be obvious. A shame you don't get it.
JurorNo.2 wrote:Maybe the studios are out of touch with the audience, but I'm not sure that's a bad thing.
Hollywood needs all the help it can get. No, trust me, it's a bad thing!
RichardLess wrote:Can we please stop with the feminist stuff? I want to gouge my eyes out everytime I read that word. Feminism is a postive thing. Bringing it up in a negative connotation is ridiculous. I hated the reboot but I hate reading about fans hating the reboot because of feminism or some vast feminist vagina conspiracy even more! It's gotten to the point where I don't even read a post past the word "feminist". Let's move on. It's been talked to death.
It's okay, we forgive you.
Alphagaia wrote:I mean, sure, you can always find bad eggs and people taking this to extremes, but to condemn the whole idea of Feminism because of this picture feels very closeminded.
Alpha if we let every single feminist complete power in the world the Earth would be a total mess. Then the only thing you'd have to say is "Whoops".
timeware wrote:That's why much of Feminism gets the negative spot light. I'm kind of disappointed that Supergirl is getting involved in politics it's one of my favorite shows.
It's okay, it's a rubbish show anyway. Helen Slater will always be the actual Supergirl, not this imposter.
Kingpin wrote:Again, I'm having a little difficultly wrapping my head around why it appears Benoist is the greater target for your displeasure than the man who originally said the remark. Trump opened that nasty door, and you seriously can't expect the women he objectified to just stand quietly in the background smiling politely.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Surely you should know this?
featofstrength wrote:Whew...that wasn't so bad! It was certainly easier than explaining the collateral damage and Superman killing in "Man of Steel!"
Yeah I get your annoyance. If you're going to accuse someone of something at least get to the point instead of dragging it out.
timeware wrote:So I mention she's a role model twice and it's seen unreasonable. My little niece and nephew do get to occasionally watch this show. They aren't teenagers, and one likes to run around in a cape watching it. I don't want to see them come across an image of their hero swearing and chanting inappropriate comments on the news.
I understand you. I was under the impression Superman and Supergirl were loved by kids. Guess I was wrong.
timeware wrote:What about Bill Clinton's action against women while he was in office, and before he took office? People want to forget about that and a certain law case that Hillary defended as well.
Simple answer: there was no social media back then and extreme political correctness. Today it would be a different story as has shown with Trump.
timeware wrote:It doesn't make it okay. I'm not trying to defend Trumps comments.
Both sides are equally guilty of mistreating women, however people want to ignore this and focus on Trump.
The problem is perspective. The Internet like it's followers have short attention spans. A lot who protest feminism against Trump are too young to even remember Bill Clinton. The Internet lacks perspective and is too reactionary. The media outrage over Answer The Call by so called 'male geek trolls' can be compared to the outrage following Trump being elected by 'feminist trolls'. See, perspective is needed a bit, simples really.