SSJmole wrote: ↑January 18th, 2019, 11:12 am But on topic I'd say it felt like the sexists 50% the anti reboot 30% and 15% other reasons (like the film as a film ect... But unfair ones too like racism) And 5% were just against the idea of Ghostbusters period as they may not have seen or liked orginal.
That's how it felt at least to me
I don't understand how you came to those numbers as they seem totally arbitrary. Also, it doesn't take into consideration the amount of people that were anti-reboot that didn't bother going to Twitter about it. Social Media itself does not represent society. There are 69 million US users on Twitter. The US population is 328. This doesn't take into consideration fake accounts, alts, and corporate accounts. Social media isn't reality and it seems like far too many people think it is. Of course it doesn't help that news networks will take tweets about stuff and report on them as if they are news.
I believe there are some people out that that saw the movie, thought it was bad, and then blamed it on their being a female cast because they didn't know why they hated it. So, they just used what was on the surface to attack a bad movie. This is what happens when a studio says their movie is great because of how woke they are, but the movie is actually bad.
To be fair, I only think this movie is bad as a Ghostbusters movie. If this movie was how they did Pixels, essentially a Ghostbusters parody, I would have liked it. However, it doesn't work as a Ghostbusters movie. The tone is just not right.