Discuss the upcoming movie to be released in 2020 and directed by Jason Reitman.
User avatar
By robbritton
#4925755
Also with the V sign being a big thing within your young pop stars around 1989.
You mean...the peace sign?
Well yeah, but I thought leaving it ambiguous covered all bases! Like maybe he’s flicking the V’s at someone behind him too! :D
User avatar
By Alphagaia
#4925759
Ghostbusters Reunion.

I'm going to call the movie that because it makes the most sense in so many ways.
By Coover5
#4925761
really hoping for continuity here and a simple 3 fingers up no ghost logo!!!!!!!!
If the production is smart and goes about it creatively, they'd steer clear of the three-finger fan logo.
Imagine if Jason not only went with three fingers up but specifically used the steelbook design. :sigh:
User avatar
By groschopf
#4925762
I wouldn't be opposed to a three logo for marketing, but using it in a diegetic manner inside the film would be stupid. Keep it simple and go with the classic.

If anything, maybe we'll see an updated version of the primary logo. Brace yourselves for some minimalism.
SpaceBallz liked this
By JonXCTrack
#4925770
If shooting has wrapped, then we're not far off from a trailer and publicity stills.

I would imagine that we'll get something in December. The new Jumanji (another Sony film) is released in December. Maybe we get a trailer with that movie.

I just hope the trailer doesn't give too much away. Maybe a clip of the kids going into the barn and seeing the old equipment and then pulling the tarp off of the Ecto-1. They ask their mom, "What is all this stuff?" Then she tells them about their grandfather and how he was a Ghostbuster. We get some flashback images as she tells her kids about the events of 1984 and 1989. Something simple like that anyway.
User avatar
By Alphagaia
#4925772
Day 68 of 62
69 unconfirmed.
Blowjob Ghost has a sad.
User avatar
By Alphagaia
#4925775
Christ, I'm too old for this shit. :sigh:
Viagra might help!
User avatar
By mrmichaelt
#4925786
I wouldn't be opposed to a three logo for marketing, but using it in a diegetic manner inside the film would be stupid. Keep it simple and go with the classic.

If anything, maybe we'll see an updated version of the primary logo. Brace yourselves for some minimalism.
As long as it's not Mooglie with a white beard holding himself up with a cane.
According to Mr. Steelberg...today is the last day of shooting.

Day 68 of 62
Do IG stories have links? I can't seem to find it for some reason.
By StarSpengledBanner82
#4925788
I wouldn't be opposed to a three logo for marketing, but using it in a diegetic manner inside the film would be stupid. Keep it simple and go with the classic.

If anything, maybe we'll see an updated version of the primary logo. Brace yourselves for some minimalism.
Yeah I've always thought it was kind of weird that they had the 2 on their uniforms in the second film. I know it was probably just for marketing but the business itself is just "Ghostbusters" and not "Ghostbusters 2" so it's just kinda odd they made that choice. I would think it was even more weird if there was a 3 on the uniforms in this movie.
groschopf liked this
User avatar
By deadderek
#4925793
What if I told you we're not getting "new" uniforms in the movie at all?

Image
2GunsRacing, SpaceBallz, back and 1 others liked this
User avatar
By deadderek
#4925797
Bruce Brownstein posted filming has wrapped.
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3vehSxAnvV/
Image
mrmichaelt, groschopf liked this
By Michael Scott
#4925802
I like that last picture with Ecto-1 in the corner.

I wouldn’t be shocked if they just kept the Rust City name for the movie. I think we can all agree that the biggest problem with GB16 was that it changed its name from Flapjack.
SpaceBallz, groschopf liked this
User avatar
By SpaceBallz
#4925809
I dont think we'll be getting new uniforms nor patches. We might see one all dusty in a box or something but theres nothing so far that tells me the GB business is still going.
Kingpin liked this
User avatar
By timeware
#4925819
like I said earlier I wouldn't be opposed to a new leather jacket. Something like Starlord's or Poe Dameron's. Seriously though we should start a petition demanding Ecto Cooler twinkies as soon as possible.
groschopf liked this
User avatar
By SpaceBallz
#4925820
Paul Rudd was on Jimmy Kimmel, Kimmel tried to get GB3 info out of him but Rudd didn't budge lol.
deadderek liked this
User avatar
By deadderek
#4925821
Paul Rudd was on Jimmy Kimmel, Kimmel tried to get GB3 info out of him but Rudd didn't budge lol.
Did he play the Mac & Me clip?
groschopf liked this
User avatar
By robbritton
#4925823
I wouldn't be opposed to a three logo for marketing, but using it in a diegetic manner inside the film would be stupid. Keep it simple and go with the classic.

If anything, maybe we'll see an updated version of the primary logo. Brace yourselves for some minimalism.
Yeah I've always thought it was kind of weird that they had the 2 on their uniforms in the second film. I know it was probably just for marketing but the business itself is just "Ghostbusters" and not "Ghostbusters 2" so it's just kinda odd they made that choice. I would think it was even more weird if there was a 3 on the uniforms in this movie.
I said this before, but the peace sign was big in 1989. It's a "we're back and down with the kids, honest" gag as much as it is a "two". It's just that time has diluted memories of the former so subsequent generations see it as confusing.

I guess the modern equivalent would be if the new no-ghost logo was flossing while holding up three fingers! (I'm 41, cut me some slack if we're beyond flossing now! :D )
groschopf, Sav C, Wafflerobot and 1 others liked this
  • 1
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 219

On Reddit there is a post with a screen grab fro[…]

Anybody from Idaho Falls?

Nothing wrong with necroposting, sometimes it take[…]

Another day....another problem. lol....at least I'[…]

It's a print of WindDrake's "detailed" g[…]