Alphagaia wrote:Just because I defend the man, does not make a (true) fan.
It's difficult to believe that when you're constantly defending him. Not once have I seen you criticise him, you referred to him as a revolutionary artist on par with Picasso and Dali.
Alphagaia wrote:The amount of absolute shit Feig had to endure and people constantly made up made me investigate how much if it was actually true and I saw a lot of exaggeration, misinterpretations and/or assumptions.
If me pointing out these things to sift through the sewage makes me a true fan in your eyes then so be it.
If you like the film that's fine but you can't argue what was going on. You see the whole thing from a one sided viewpoint. You've never once questioned what Feig and feminists have done with the franchise. In fact you've supported their efforts. I'm not trying to have a go at you for the sake of it but you have to admit this all raises question marks man.
JurorNo.2 wrote:Just because you like certain aspects doesn't mean the other aspects (which are clearly not in question) don't count.
I never said that. I'm saying the mixture works and that what's always attracted me to the films. It's no more a comedy than Back to the Future is.
timeware wrote:You have also done the same thing you accused me of. There's been quite a few instances of you ignoring evidence I and others had gathered. I'll agree to move on if that's the last of it.
I've not once heard Alpha respond to evidence I've provided. I'm assuming he glances over it without a second thought. A shame as I go through a bit of trouble to provide video and article links.
Kingpin wrote:And I think you'll find that there are plenty of extreme groups that rally around themselves when they're attacked, not just extreme feminists, right-wing conservative religious groups have made a career out of rallying together and motivating their support base against a common enemy.
Oh yeah definitely. Either side is capable of that.