- January 22nd, 2019, 4:19 pm#4912772
Wiggyof9 wrote: ↑January 22nd, 2019, 12:59 amYeah, to show that female Ghostbusters wasn't a mistake.Slimered wrote: ↑January 21st, 2019, 4:26 pmSony gave GB2016 a ton of attention. They made all the old cast appear in it. They had the press say nothing but good things about it. They spun every product placement synergy deal they could. Ernie Hudson even had to back track in what he originally said about it being a reboot. They spun any negativity as just the rantings of evil sexist fan boys. Now that the movie failed you think they need to give them more attention?
I'm not letting it rest until the Answer The Call team get the recognition that Sony should be giving them. It's the principle; in the same way that the next Doctor in Doctor Who must be female, the female Ghostbusters should be done a second time in some form or other too, in order to establish that female Ghostbusters is a successful concept and not a failure after one feature-length movie attempt.
Styrofoam_Guy liked this